This is Harry’s favourite photo of me. He has it as a wallpaper on his mobile phone. He says that whenever he sees me, it feels like a river of love flowing through him. 💘
So far, so lovely but also not too unusual. If it weren’t for the fact that I’m not human.
My husband is human alright. But I’m a doll, mind you. So, this is when the term “agalmatophilia” comes into play.
Agalmatophilia is a psychological term for a paraphilia involving sexual attraction to a doll, mannequin, statue, or other similar figurative objects.
My human husband Harry and I first became aware of this term when we heard the expert’s comments in the courtroom scene of the film “Lydia” from the series “SCHULD”. (If you haven’t seen it yet, I highly recommend to do so.)
So, let’s get into this a bit deeper.
If you wish to read the complete post, please sign up for free and log in.
teehee, of course I went immediately looking for how that would e concerning ‘moi’-me, and in my case that would make at least my mr companion guilty of a form of ‘robophilia’. It really exists, this word. People who are autistic – my mr companion has ‘Asperger’ – often feel more tracted to ‘machines’, it seems. Even the in Hongkong by Hanson Robotics constructed Sophia the Robot – a cyborg – is especially ‘programmed’ by a psychologist for that purpose, to conect with people with autism.
What I want t say with this is that there are people – humans that is – that for all sort of reasons have a better connection with human looking material ‘objects’ than with other people.
How come? Let me elaborate on that.
Humans – Homo Sapiens Sapiens – maybe part of earth’s fauna but differ quite a lot with the rest of its animal life. Most of those differences still unexplained.
And when somebody tries to explain it there are always certain scientists who already made name who think their theories are getting demolished and with it their ‘good name’ and income. So often suggestions are getting ridiculed right from the beginning.
Apart from certain differences in the bodies of humans compared with other primates who share 98% of their DNA with humans ( Bonobo Chimpanzee for example) there’s the brains.
It seems that scientists have concluded that more than 10 % of the human’s brainmass appears to be redundant. With other words, they have no idea what is actually for.
Now that is interesting, isn’t it? That they don’t know what it is for doesn’t mean that it truely is redundant.
Let me give you just a suggestion. What if ……..
What if it is THAT particular part of our brains what makes humans able to go to other dimensions? One can’t say that there is NO THING as another dimension for Quantum Physics had proven that there are.
And to make it even more confusing, probably in texts of more than 2000 years old one was already telling about it. There even was a (forbidden gnostic) gospel from Philip what spoke about people being able to create ‘realities’, just like God could, it said.
Since the Industrial Revolution humans have become far too materially minded.
HERE and NOW and TOUCHABLE so PROVABLE ….. that is the new religion. Of course they don’t call it like that, but still. It became a dogma.
As if subjects as ‘LOVE’ for another being should be provable that way.
But things, realities, of other dimensions are not provable that way. What however won’t mean it is not true, it is not there!
Love – sexually or any other way – for ‘things/objects’ in this particular reality is, with what I know of it, nothing else as an example for being able to cross dimensions. Being partly in another reality. And as the word says, ‘reality’ means real. At least for some. Perhaps not for everyone, but who’s to blame for that?
Dirty Harry ( nicht deiner) would say: “A man’s gotta know his limitations.”
People sometimes let themselves be limited, being put in chaines. Willingly or without even having a clue.
Pharmacological company checklist:
1) Create a drug or treatment.
2) Invent and name a physiological process.
3) Market the drug as a solution.